June 19, 1972

Flood v. Kuhn

Supreme Court of the United States 407 U.S. 258 MLB Antitrust

Curt Flood refused a trade and sued the reserve clause directly, all the way to the Supreme Court — and lost. The Court acknowledged baseball's antitrust exemption was an anomaly, then upheld it anyway on legal inertia. Flood's loss did something his win couldn't have: it convinced the players' union that courts weren't the way out. Three years later, they found a technicality instead.

Why it still matters

The clearest demonstration in sports law that losing in court can produce a better strategy than winning.

Sources

Historical summaries prepared from published opinions and secondary sources. Commentary and analysis, not legal advice.

Labor & CBA Employment