June 19, 1972
Flood v. Kuhn
Curt Flood refused a trade and sued the reserve clause directly, all the way to the Supreme Court — and lost. The Court acknowledged baseball's antitrust exemption was an anomaly, then upheld it anyway on legal inertia. Flood's loss did something his win couldn't have: it convinced the players' union that courts weren't the way out. Three years later, they found a technicality instead.
Why it still matters
The clearest demonstration in sports law that losing in court can produce a better strategy than winning.
Sources
- Opinion, 407 U.S. 258 (1972)Opinion
Historical summaries prepared from published opinions and secondary sources. Commentary and analysis, not legal advice.
Labor & CBA Employment