In re NCAA Eligibility Rules Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 3198
Eligibility MDL
Stakes
Twenty-one eligibility suits against the NCAA, filed across eleven districts, and a motion to gather them before one judge. Consolidation is usually described as housekeeping; here it decides which circuit's law shapes the eligibility rules and how quickly an athlete can get an injunction. A player suing for one more season needs a ruling in weeks, and an MDL is not built to move in weeks.
Details
- Plaintiffs
- Diego Pavia, Zakai Zeigler, Cohen Fuller, Javier Morton, KaTron Evans, and other athlete plaintiffs across 21 actions
- Defendants
- NCAA
- Venue
- U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
- Docket number
- MDL No. 3198
- Posture
- Motion for transfer and coordination pending before the Panel. Briefing closed by minute order on September 3, 2026, signed by Clerk of the Panel Jessica D. Birnbaum, which lists 21 associated actions. Several athlete plaintiffs filed responses in opposition to transfer on August 26, 2026; the NCAA filed its reply on September 2. Notices of presentation of oral argument and notices of waiver were filed by both sides on August 31 and September 1. No transferee judge has been assigned and the docket records the assignment as "Not Assigned".
Key dates
- TBD (not yet scheduled) No hearing session date on the Panel docket. Briefing closed September 3, 2026; the motion awaits a Panel hearing session
Timeline
- Aug 1, 2026 MDL No. 3198 docketed before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
- Aug 26, 2026 Responses in opposition to transfer filed by plaintiff Javier Morton, plaintiff Cohen Fuller, and the group of plaintiffs in the three Middle District of Tennessee actions (entries 26, 27, 28).
- Aug 31, 2026 Plaintiffs split on argument: notices of presentation of oral argument filed for the Tennessee Middle District and Colorado plaintiff groups, and notices of waiver of oral argument filed for plaintiffs Cohen Fuller and Zakai Zeigler (entries 29, 30, 31, 32).
- Sep 1, 2026 The NCAA filed a notice of presentation of oral argument (entry 33).
- Sep 2, 2026 The NCAA filed its reply in support of transfer, and a notice of related action identifying eight further actions in the Southern and Northern Districts of West Virginia, the District of Idaho, the District of Nevada and the District of Colorado (entries 34, 35).
- Sep 3, 2026 Minute order closing briefing on the transfer motion, signed by Clerk of the Panel Jessica D. Birnbaum. The order lists 21 associated actions and reminds the parties of the duty to notify the Clerk of potential tag-along actions under Panel Rules 6.1(f) and 6.2(d) (MDL No. 3198, entry 36).
- Sep 3, 2026
Minute order closing briefing on the transfer motion, signed by Clerk of the Panel Jessica D. Birnbaum. The order lists 21 associated actions and reminds the parties of the duty to notify the Clerk of potential tag-along actions under Panel Rules 6.1(f) and 6.2(d) (MDL No. 3198, entry 36).
Source → - Sep 2, 2026
The NCAA filed its reply in support of transfer, and a notice of related action identifying eight further actions in the Southern and Northern Districts of West Virginia, the District of Idaho, the District of Nevada and the District of Colorado (entries 34, 35).
Source → - Sep 1, 2026
The NCAA filed a notice of presentation of oral argument (entry 33).
Source → - Aug 31, 2026
Plaintiffs split on argument: notices of presentation of oral argument filed for the Tennessee Middle District and Colorado plaintiff groups, and notices of waiver of oral argument filed for plaintiffs Cohen Fuller and Zakai Zeigler (entries 29, 30, 31, 32).
Source → - Aug 26, 2026
Responses in opposition to transfer filed by plaintiff Javier Morton, plaintiff Cohen Fuller, and the group of plaintiffs in the three Middle District of Tennessee actions (entries 26, 27, 28).
Source → - Aug 1, 2026
MDL No. 3198 docketed before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
Source →
Sources
Compiled from public filings, court records, league statements, and published reporting. Status reflects the last verified date shown on each entry and may not capture subsequent developments. Commentary and analysis, not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed through this content.